Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  388 / 392 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 388 / 392 Next Page
Page Background

Considering the conservative approach in the analysis of critical failures, crack III is

assumed to have 30 mm depth over the entire observed length. In this case the problem

should be considered in the section oriented transversally to the longitudinal direction of

the vessel, where the curvature effect is ignored and quite justifiable for 50 mm thickness

and 2400 mm diameter. The analysis becomes two-dimensional (plain strain) and the

problem is considered as a plate under tension with an edge crack. If the remote stress is

assumed to be the sum of circumferential stress induced by internal pressure (‘boiler for-

mula’) and the residual stress in the weld centre, the stress intensity factor is as follows:

I

6 1200

1.12

1.12

200 30 3741 MPa mm

50

R

pR

K

a

t

σ

π

π

⋅

⎛

⎞

⎛

⎞

=

+

=

+

=

⎜

⎟

⎜

⎟

⎝

⎠

⎝

⎠

(12)

In case that the residual-stress effects are ignored, the following is obtained:

I

6 1200

1.12

1.12

30 1565 MPa mm

50

pR

K

a

t

π

π

⋅

⎛ ⎞

⎛

⎞

=

=

=

⎜ ⎟

⎜

⎟

⎝ ⎠

⎝

⎠

(13)

which is close to brittle fracture (ratio

K

I

/

K

I

c

= 0.99 shows there is practically no reserve

regarding the risk of brittle fracture, not even if residual stresses are ignored. In the net

section stress

σ

n

= 2.5

pR/t

+

σ

R

, where factor 2.5 is taken into account because of section

weakening from a 30 mm long crack in 50 mm thickness. Thus, the following is obtained:

2.5

2.5 6 1200 200

50

2

2

0.97

500 650

R

n

R

F

eH M

pR

t

S

R R

σ

σ

σ

⋅ ⋅

+

+

= =

=

=

+

+

(14)

Based on values obtained for

K

I

/

K

I

c

and

σ

n

/

σ

F

, it is obvious that the point (0.99; 0.97)

is located deeply within the unsafe region, Fig. 13.

K

r

S

r

Figure 13. Failure Analysis Diagram (FAD) for the considered pipeline crack

The calculation of stress state using the finite element method (FEM) is made based

on the model shown in Fig. 14 (a quarter of inserted pipe). The results of analysis pre-

sented in Tab. 1 show that the collar decreases stresses from 144 MPa to 80 MPa, in the

region of pipe parts 250 mm away from the middle of the collar, which corresponds to the

location of joints with cracks. However, even with so reduced operating stress, the corre-

sponding point in FAD drops into an unsafe region, as the value for

S

r

modifies to 0.7,

while the value of

K

r

remains unmodified (0.99). However, one should have in mind that

384