Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  365 / 392 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 365 / 392 Next Page
Page Background

Figure 10. Impact toughness against

∆

t

8/5

for a single cycle CGHAZ (left), and against

T

p

2

for

HSLA structural steel Nionicral 70 (right)

.

D le-cycle HAZ was previously CGHAZ.

)

and

pli-

cat

m

0

m

oub

Measurement of mechanical properties (yield strength and ultimate tensile strength

rheological material properties of different zones of welded joints is pretty com

ed. Standard gauge-length of tensile specimen has be at least 10 times longer than the

diameter. Simulated microstructure exists only in the middle of the sample, therefore

some adapted tensile specimens should be used. An experimental set-up is sketched in

Fig. 11.

Hourglass-shaped specimens were used in reference [13]. The load,

F

, the load-line

displacement,

∆

l

, and circumference,

π

D

, had been measured during specimen loading.

Change of circumference can be used for the determination of decreasing cross-section

diameter

D

. The circumference enabled calculating true strain during tensile testing,

because standard strain measurement in the longitudinal direction of the specimen is not

possible here.

The diagram with load (

F

) transformed into engineering stress (

σ

0

) versus load-line

displacement (

∆

l

) enabled determining ultimate tensile stress,

R

, if the value

σ

is

known. Fracture stress,

σ

f

, is expressed by

σ

0

f

(Fig. 12–top). The engineering strain (

ε

0

) is

calculated via change of specimen’s current diameter,

D

, and yield stress,

R

p

0.2

, on the

basis of

σ

0

p

0.2

(Fig. 12–bottom).

Strength coefficient

A

and plastic strain exponent

n

are determined using logarithmic

dependence of true stress against true strain (Fig. 13).

361

Figure 11. Experimental determination of mechanical and rheological properties

of material with the simulated microstructure