Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  364 / 392 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 364 / 392 Next Page
Page Background

4. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SIMULATED MATERIAL

Hardness of the simulated microstructure is not difficult to measure. Actual hardness

data are available from real welded joints, too. Brinell hardness of a single cycle HAZ for

HSLA steel Ninonicral 70 is shown in Fig. 8–left [13]. Peak temperature,

T

p

≅

700°C

represents

Ac

1

temperature of the steel, whereas

T

p

approaching 1400°C represents the

zone close to the fusion line. The hardest is the CGHAZ. Impact toughness of the same

HAZ as that in Fig. 8–left, is shown in Fig. 8–right [13]. The hardest zone of HAZ, i.e.

the CGHAZ, has the lowest toughness.

It is an easy task to determine impact toughness on simulated microstructures. Size of

the sample is so defined that standard Charpy specimens can be machined. The region

with the simulated microstructure is a few millimetres long and located in the middle of

the sample, and the V-notch can be positioned at this point (Fig. 9–left). As an example,

Charpy impact toughness vs. temperature (S curve) for the simulated microstructure of a

CGHAZ of HSLA Nionicral 70 steel [15] is shown in Fig. 9–right.

Figure 8. Hardness HB (left) and V notch Charpy impact toughness at –40°C (right) for

specimens, simulated at different temperatures

T

p

, meaning across the whole width of the HAZ

360

10

55

10

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

8

T [° C]

Impact toughness [J]

0

peak temperature of subsequent thermal cycle, as shown by an example for the same

steel, in Fig. 10–right [13].

Figure 9. Charpy specimen machined from the sample with simulated microstructure

of the CGHAZ (left), and its S-curve (right)

The relation between impact toughness and cooling rate can be studied as shown in

Fig. 10–left for HSLA Nionicral 70 steel, and the relation between impact toughness and