Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  299 / 392 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 299 / 392 Next Page
Page Background

Table 12. Computational results

Models and variants Thickness

δ

1

[

cm

]

Thickness

δ

2

[

cm

]

Max.

D

[

cm

]

Max. stress

kN/cm

2

Max. stress

sleeve

Model A var 1

2.75

4.50

2.70

27.5

27.5

var 2

4.05

5.75

2.66

16.9

15.0

var 3

6.00

7.75

2.62

16.9

10.0

Model B var 1

2.75

4.50

2.72

25.7

25.7

var 2

4.05

5.75

2.67

16.9

16.0

var 3

6.00

7.75

2.63

16.9

10.0

var 4

5.00

6.65

2.65

16.9

12.0

var 5

5.50

6.65

2.65

16.9

11.0

var 6

5.75

7.50

2.63

16.9

10.0

Model C var 1

4.50

4.50

2.68

16.9

16.0

var 2

5.75

5.75

2.65

16.9

11.5

Model D var 1

4.50

6.25

2.66

16.9

14.0

var 2

5.75

7.50

2.64

16.9

11.0

3.13. Recovery of the fractured tooth (containing cracks)

In order to define recovery procedures, if possible, two 3D models of 5 teeth (0 and 1

in Fig. 34) and the stress distribution have been analysed after gear-wheel failure in the

Cement Factory mill, in Beočin. The behaviour of the fractured tooth part (170 mm in

length) has been correlated to the entire tooth length of 650 mm behaviour (without

cracks). Note that the position of the stress lines is similar in both cases (the stress in

model 1 is about 20% higher than in model 0, Table 13). So it is concluded that the frac-

tured tooth can be in function.

The fine 3D model consisted of 13 869 nodal points and 11 352 volumes. It confirmed

the conclusion obtained using the first model.

Stress 0–14 kN/cm

2

Model 0

Model

Model 1

Stress 0–14 kN/cm

2

Figure 34. Models and stress fields in loading 2

Table 13. Stress ratios of models 0 and 1, at two loading conditions

Maximal stress

[

kN/cm

2

]

Loading 1

Loading 2

Model 0/Model 1

7.8/10

26/32.8

To get more closer insight, the fine 2D model of a single tooth is also prepared and

analysed. Obtained results are presented in Fig. 35 and in Table 14. The zone, which must

not have cracks, is the area limited within the lines at a distance of about 25 mm from the

top of the tooth and about 15 mm from the side of the tooth (see Fig. 36).

The fine 2D model of five teeth with appropriate supports and loads confirmed results

obtained by the single tooth model.

295