Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  289 / 392 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 289 / 392 Next Page
Page Background

Figure 12. Contour, supports, and loading

Figure 13. Stress field of the bogie-wheel

Table 5. Percentual portions of stresses and deformation energy

Element

Membrane/Bending stress Deformation energy

Corona

0.8

0.5

2.3

Cone

14.1

2.5

7.4

Membrane

13.5

0.5

6.2

Hollow shaft

22.5

45.6

84.1

Sum

50.9

49.1

100

3.6. Diagnosed behaviour of the rotary excavator cantilever (C700S)

Fracture of some elements of the supporting cantilever of the bucket wheel excavator

SchRs 630 (Kolubara Metal Lazarevac) appeared in service, due to the appearance of

resonant frequencies with oscillation amplitudes up to 60 cm, disturbing the cantilever

dynamic behaviour.

The construction consists of one beam element and three bar elements: tie, yoke, and

cylinder, as modelled in Fig. 14. Strain energy is distributed as follows: beam 72.2%, tie

16.6%, cylinder 10.5%, and yoke 0.5% (Fig. 15).

tie

beam

yoke

cylinder

Figure 14. Plane model of the cantilever

Figure 15. Cantilever strain –

f

max

= 10.4 cm

Static computation reveals that declination of the beam is too big at the joint support;

the axial force in the tie and cylinder is high, but in the yoke is minor; bending moment in

the part of the beam linked to the yoke is high; and strain energy of the beam is dominant.

Dynamic computation has shown that the first two frequencies are low, close to each

other (Fig. 16) and coincide with the static deformation; the factor of dynamic amplifica-

tion is too large; both the imaginary part of frequency characteristic and strain energy

dominate in beam and in external masses (system is unstable), Tables 6–8, Figs. 17–19.

f

01

= 1.58 Hz

f

02

= 1.81 Hz

f

03

= 4.30 Hz

f

04

= 8.25 Hz

Figure 16. First four main modes of oscillations

285