Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  53 / 352 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 352 Next Page
Page Background

49

hardening curve (i.e. “universal” flow curve)

ߪ

ത ൌ ݂ሺ

ߝ

ҧሻ

. Time rate of actual stress is

singled out by the requirement that it must be compatible with the current rate of strain

hardening, by tangent to the strain hardening curve. It must be noted that this statement

does not hold for arbitrary assumed or virtual deviatoric stresses and strains,

T

and

ߝ

.

This assumption implicitly states that actual and virtual stress and strain coincide until

actual instant of time (denoted by

߬ ൌ 0

). Then these two may split such that actual stress

increment remains tangent to actual stress trajectory, whereas virtual stress may be

oblique with respect to it. If the condition of Eq. ( 14 ) is not satisfied, then bifurcation

leading to plastic instability takes place.

A2-3. The strain tensor used almost exclusively by Hill /29/ is logarithmic Eulerian

(true) strain tensor which in terms of its proper directions

i

Ԧ

,

i

Ԧ

,

i

Ԧ

has the form (with

summation over repeated indices implied),

ߝ

i

Ԧ

۪

i

Ԧ

ln

ߣ

ؠ

i

Ԧ

۪

i

Ԧ

ߝ

, where

ߣ

ߣ ,

ߣ ,

are principal stretches. For a parallelepiped with edges

L

1

, L

2

, L

3

is

ߣ

L

L

଴௞

ሺ݇ ൌ 1,2,3ሻ

. The conjugate stress tensor is Cauchy stress such that work increment

equals

ߜ

ܹ ൌ T :δε

. According to this assumption

ߝݎݐ

ൌ 0,

ߝݎݐ

ሶ ൌ 0

for advanced plastic

strains. This means that elastic strains are negligible and plastic incompressibility holds.

A2-4. For proportional plane stress paths

݉ ൌ

ߪ

ߪ

ൌ ܿ݋݊

ݐݏ

the onset of diffuse

instability appears when

ߪ

ߪ

ߝ

ߪ ,

ߪ

ߝ

.

This means that previous assumption

holds and that maximum of two in-plane engineering stresses appear simultaneously

when diffuse instability begins.

Analysis

1. Hillier used the Hill's principle, Eq. (14) in the following way /20/. According to

assumption A2-2 we must have at

߬ ൌ 0

the equalities:

T'

=

T'

௔௖௧௨௔௟

ߪ ,

ത ൌ

ߪ

௔௖௧௨௔௟

, e'ൌe'

௔௖௧௨௔௟

,

as well as

e'ሶ ൌ e'ሶ

௔௖௧௨௔௟

where the last

equality follows from Eq. (1). Now, differentiating Eq. (14) with respect to time,

replacing the above equalities in it and taking ccount stress homogeneity, it is

ߪ

തሶ

௔௖௧௨௔௟

ߪ

തሶ

(15)

The inverse sign of inequality would mean instability. Therefore, the instability

condition may be written as follows

1 ܼ

௔௖௧௨௔௟

ൌ 1

ߪ

௔௖௧௨௔௟

݀

ߪ

௔௖௧௨௔௟

݀

ߝ

ҧ

௔௖௧௨௔௟

൑ 1

ߪ

ത ݀

ߪ

ത ݀

ߝ

ҧ ൌ 1 ܼ

(16)

The limiting value of Z where this becomes equality is referred to as the critical

subtangent (Fig. 2.a).

(a)Definition (b) Hiller’s calculation of critical subtangent

Figure 2: Notion of critical subtangent