Group 3 75 vulnerability of these heritage places. Besides, five possible scenarios in terms of usage of warehouses are hypothesized i.e., Museum, Offices, Community Center, Hotel, as well as without any function - vacant-. Each scenario is evaluated by the index and analyzed by considering all the defined factors. Table 1: Vulnerability factors and level of vulnerability according to possible scenarios. Vulnerability factors Level of vulnerability Linguistic descriptors Current occupation and use Low 1 Noticed and respected by people inside and outside Medium 2 Noticed and respected by people only outside High 3 Not noticed and/or respected by people Heritage value Low 1 Concerned and well-known at international level Medium 2 Concerned and well-known at national level High 3 Not concerned and/or well-known at all Structural modifications Low 1 Nearly no modification Medium 2 Modifications that made with professional guidance High 3 Modifications conflicting with the identity Maintenance for Installation systems Low 1 Regular condition monitoring Medium 2 No condition monitoring High 3 No condition monitoring and installation not used for long time Degree of Conservation Low 1 Optimal conservation Medium 2 Requires conservation High 3 Ruin [RESULTS AND DISCUSSION] Flood Areas Figure 2 shows the flood zones in Trondheim. These are located on both sides of the riverbank and in the coastal area. Figures 3, 4 and 5 show the affected zones within the 3 study cultural urban areas and show an increase in the flooded zones in the near future (2100). While the cathedral is not affected by the floods, the
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM0NDE=