Group 4 97 studies individually. Unfortunately, while doing this operation we faced some issues related to the lack of quantitative data to produce reliable conclusions. For this reason, we prefer to leave the table empty in order to show to the readers only the method of a possible risk analysis considering aesthetic, society and environment aspects and we really hope to have further occasions to collect data and fill out the table accurately. Future research can consider the idea of creating one table for each of the different case studies and compare them by overlapping. In this way, it would be possible to see analyze them as a set. This could have been the most interesting aspect of the tables because it would have allowed us to establish priorities and strategies on a preservation plan. Table 4. Climate Changes risks affecting identity items (society, aesthetic, environment) in a case study. Although it was not possible to complete the table with reliable data, the authors nevertheless tried and obtained a preliminary result (shown in Table 5). Even if not all fields are filled in, and the information contained can only be considered qualitative, it can already be noted that among the three cases taken into consideration (Warehouses, Nidarosdomen and Dora bunker), warehouses are in a more dangerous situation when we consider the possible risks associated with climate change. Table 5. Preliminary results.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjM0NDE=